A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving prospective neighbours over the development of a wall in a coastal web site in a north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted national attention adhering to an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones residence at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental problems, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Times write-up about René Collier along with the Irish Occasions post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has evolved into a highly publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building operates at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, find to create their household residence. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, wherever growth pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven citizens. Based on the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting constructed by their potential neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted under setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both residents of Dublin Street, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their organizing authorization by creating a wall beyond the boundaries in their website, resulting in an encroachment on the Exclusive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, therefore areas are subject matter to stringent controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological implications, particularly in a delicate coastal ecosystem like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their preparing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially designed, is in the right place. Their lawful staff has characterised the action being an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The pair accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding in an effort to maintain their watch, an allegation which has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal planning disputes, where views of the sea are the two really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable attempts via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, according to sworn evidence referenced while in the Irish Times. In one account, Rene Collier waded through waist-high drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, an image which has since grow to be emblematic of the depth in the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they ended up meant to Collect visual proof of the wall’s posture relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Moments described, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o in the course of intense climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the location grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely famous that these actions had been cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was getting encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up lined intimately via the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 grew to become greatly searched phrases as readers sought to be aware of the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court heard additional submissions on whether interim orders must be granted to halt design pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial minute within the authorized timeline.
Within the Main of the dispute is really a disagreement above boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as produced, goes further than what was permitted and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has become called meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and situations attached towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the site and businessman René Collier have both stressed that their action is motivated by problem for environmental defense and adherence to preparing law. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting alternatively that it is about ensuring that growth at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got explained their long-standing relationship to the region as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few only seeking to develop a family members property in accordance with the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Specific Region of Conservation and say that all works have already been carried out determined by Experienced information and accredited designs. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like getting into the sea throughout a storm, never alter the fundamental details.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how arranging disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute in excess of construction of wall at coastal site happens to be a shorthand description for a problem that numerous observers see as significantly widespread. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation between personal land, community foreshore, and guarded habitats is becoming a lot more contentious.
The Irish Times post about René Collier noted which the businessman had Earlier been linked to neighborhood advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, while not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from extremely diverse Expert backgrounds can discover them selves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, have grown to be synonymous While using the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via midsection-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Moments and René Collier waded by means of midsection-substantial drinking water all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Times are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting each the Bodily truth with the coastline and also the symbolic character from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an excessive strategy.
As being the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome stays uncertain. The court docket need to establish whether the wall as constructed complies with organizing authorization and no matter if any encroachment right into a Particular Region of Conservation has happened. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing disorders. Nevertheless the human component continues to be central: neighbours who need to Dwell together with one another prolonged following the lawful prices are already paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction operates at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, but the implications of the situation increase over and above that handle. For planners, developers, and residents alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the value of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition it underscores how immediately an area disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for example environmental safety and property legal rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre from the dispute stands partly created, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal issues. Regardless of whether it's going to finally be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as planned will rely upon the courtroom’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will likely proceed to appear in headlines, connected indelibly to one of the most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.